Is there the legitimacy to address the issue of knowledge in terms of gender segregation?. This question is not only legitimate, as it is treated as a topic for research in the context of gender differences in psychology; which exceeds the women's movement (Feminism), which means the affirmation of equality between women and men's rights, using the former's proposal to abolish the differences in the quality of knowledge. It goes beyond, as well as the new women's (Feminist post-modernism), which was marked by criticism of rational solitary male (Pallogocentrism) refused to decentralize the sequel, which came to the tendency of central Europe, also beyond gender (Gender), type of sexual does not mean biological sex differences, but also adds to the overall conditions, experiences and social roles that make men men and women are women.
On the basis of differentiation emerged philosophical tendency in Europe was invited female philosophy of science is trying to highlight the value of knowledge in the female
• Introduction to the female side of knowledge:
Perhaps we can be attributed to the famous psychologist Jung beginnings to the present methodology Aklitin division between male and one male were invited by the spirit of Animus) (and the second female, calling on the spirit of feminine Anima. Which is why researchers later linked to the biological aspect; as the left half of the brain responsible for the logically linked male spirit and the right half of the brain is responsible for the female side. Here it is evident through the following:
"It is important to us now that we have come to this point to recall the talk in the newly discovered brain physiology: I mean, who guided him Discrimination R.. W.. Sperry, saying that we had already become divided into two people living inside our heads, in the semi-Alkroyen the right and left brain. We have known for a a long time that the left hemispheric brain is dominated by the language, while the right identification (or discrimination). as well as the left half with the logic and reason, while the right Baltdhuq Kalastmtaa art.
And half the brain associated with each crossing of the fibers, if the crossing is removed, both of them continue to work separately from the other. Thus, if offered an apple to the left half of the brain (which, in fact, right eye) and, if offered an orange on the left half, and asked what I saw of the Tok Vostagib: apple. But if you are asked to write what I have seen your hand left and just in the moment, you write: orange. If asked why written Vork, Vostagib: apple. This means that each half of the brain does not know half of what he is thinking of the other, when cutting the lines of communication.
However, the results arising from this experience and that have the most significant is that the object that calls the «you» or settle yourself in the left half of your brain. There are «you» again after a few inches, in half right: but silent.
When a calculation on paper, I used half of the left camp, with a share of the aid offered by the right from time to time, through sudden insights.
0 comments:
Post a Comment